Geopolitical Report ISSN 2785-2598 Volume 45 Issue 8
Author: Silvia Boltuc

Executive Summary

The recent knife attack in Solingen, Germany, underscores Islamist terrorism’s persistent threat within the country, particularly from individuals with radical convictions linked to the Islamic State.

The perpetrator, a Syrian migrant previously set for deportation, confessed to the attack, which resulted in three deaths and several injuries. This incident has reignited the debate on immigration, security policies, and the adequacy of current counter-terrorism measures in Germany.

This report aims to analyse the incident’s implications for Germany’s internal security and regional stability, drawing on previous analyses by SpecialEurasia, local and international media reports, and official statements.

Key Findings

1. A radicalised Syrian migrant ideologically linked to the Islamic State conducted the attack, highlighting ongoing security vulnerabilities in Germany’s refugee and immigration policies.
2. The event has deepened the political debate surrounding immigration, as opposition parties are demanding more stringent controls and enhanced deportation strategies for migrants originating from conflict zones.
3. The increase in knife-related crimes and the consequent legislative propositions for more stringent weapons laws signify a mounting apprehension regarding the efficacy of security frameworks.

Background Information

On Friday, August 23^rd, 2024, a perpetrator identified as Issa Al H., a 26-year-old Syrian migrant, conducted a knife attack during a local festival celebrating the city’s 650^th anniversary which resulted in the three people dead and eight injured. On Saturday, August 24^th, 2024, the Islamic State claimed the attack, citing revenge for Muslims in Palestine as the motive.

After authorities denied his asylum request and started deportation proceedings in 2023, Issa Al H. had been living in a refugee home in Solingen.

Germany has faced a heightened threat of jihadist-motivated violence, as shown by the Federal Criminal Police Office’s (BKA) warnings. The country has absorbed over a million refugees from Syria and Afghanistan in recent years, leading to an increased risk of radicalisation among certain segments of the migrant population.

This incident, alongside a broader increase in knife crimes across Germany, has sparked debates over the adequacy of current security measures and the potential need for legislative reform.

Analysis

The Solingen attack underscores significant gaps in Germany’s immigration and security policies. Germany’s counter-terrorism apparatus is being questioned because of their inability to deport a radicalised individual and their failure to effectively monitor his activities. The attack’s timing, coinciding with ongoing discussions about the country’s refugee policies, has further fuelled political and public discourse on the need for stricter immigration controls.

The Islamic State’s involvement in claiming responsibility for the attack suggests that the group, despite its diminished territorial control, remains a potent ideological force capable of inspiring lone-wolf attacks within Europe.

The link between the Solingen incident and broader jihadist networks indicates Germany remains a high-priority target for Islamist extremists, particularly those motivated by the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East.

The rise in knife-related crimes, as evidenced by the nearly 10% increase in incidents involving serious bodily harm, reflects broader societal challenges, including integration difficulties and the spread of violent subcultures among certain migrant communities. The debate is further complicated by whether the perpetrators’ national origins or socio-economic circumstances directly link them to these crimes.

Risk Assessment

The security risk in Germany remains elevated, particularly concerning lone-wolf attacks inspired by Islamist ideology. Enhanced monitoring and intelligence-gathering efforts are necessary because of the ongoing threat posed by radicalised individuals within the refugee population.

The incident has worsened divisions within German society over immigration policy, potentially strengthening support for far-right groups advocating for strict measures against migrants, which increase the political risk.

There is a significant risk of copycat attacks being instigated by the Islamic State or other extremist factions, particularly in nations where there is a sizable influx of migrants from regions affected by conflict.

The incident may also influence European Union (EU) policies on border security and refugee management, leading to a tightening of asylum procedures and increased cooperation on counter-terrorism initiatives.

Possible future scenarios include:

• Increased Security Measures. Germany has the option to enforce stricter immigration controls, improve deportation procedures, and strengthen counter-terrorism measures. These actions could decrease the chances of similar attacks, but they may also provoke public opinion and intensify polarisation.
• Political Shift. The incident has the potential to alter the political landscape, allowing far-right parties to gain more support, ultimately resulting in more stringent immigration regulations and a more security-oriented approach towards migration.
• Regional Cooperation. The EU might strengthen its collective security and immigration policies, leading to greater collaboration among member states in monitoring and managing the movement of refugees and migrants across borders.
• Increasing lone-wolf attacks against civilian. The European geopolitical risk may escalate as terrorist organisations, including the Islamic State, might intensify lone-wolf attacks on civilians, particularly during national and local festivities and special occasions.
  

  ---

If you require additional information and consultation regarding terrorist threats and activities in Europe, please do not hesitate to contact us at info@specialeurasia.com and inquire about our weekly monitoring report service.